I. CONSTITUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL. Article 1. In pursuance of the Agreement signed on the 8th day of August by the. The lesser-known International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) was . The Charter provided for MacArthur to appoint judges to the IMTFE from the. In our opinion the laws of the Charter is decisive and binding on the Tribunal. This is a special tribunal set up by the Supreme Commander under authority.
|Published (Last):||13 December 2007|
|PDF File Size:||2.57 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Tokyo Charter – Wikipedia
Department of Justice gave this matter a great deal of thought and produced a treatise on the subject for the benefit of Allied prosecutors in Tokyo. The Tribunal shall neither require proof, of facts of common knowledge, nor of the authenticity of official j government documents and reports of any nation nor of the proceedings, records, and findings jmtfe military or other agencies of any of the United Nations.
Article 1 Tribunal established The International Military Tribunal for the Far East is hereby established for the just and prompt trial and punishment of the major war criminals in the Far East. The first trial shall be held at Nuremberg, and any subsequent trials shall be held at such places as the Tribunal may decide.
Australia, Canada, India, and the Netherlands were willing to see the general make some reductions in sentences. The judgment will be announced in open court imtge will give the reasons on which it is based. Take strict measures to prevent any action which would cause any unreasonable delay and rule out irrelevant issues and statements of any kind whatsoever.
The charter iktfe out the jurisdiction of the tribunal and established the individual responsibility of the accused for acts imgfe state and for acts taken in compliance with superior orders.
These interviews were conducted without the protection of any legal counsel. Like the Nuremberg Trialsthe criminal cyarter used by the Tokyo Trials was closer to civil law than to common lawwith a trial before a panel of judges rather than a jury trial and with wide allowance for hearsay evidence.
All decisions imtfw judgments of this Tribunal, including convictions and sentences, shall be chqrter a majority vote of those Members of the Tribunal present. A Japanese scholar also was indicted, but charges against him were dropped during the trial because he was declared unfit due to mental illness.
Japan surrendered six days later, on August 14, Following World War II, the victorious Allied governments established the first international criminal tribunals to prosecute high-level political officials and military authorities for war crimes and other wartime atrocities.
The record of the trial will be transmitted directly to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers for his action thereon.
ICC – Legal Tools record: Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East 
The Japanese public, Western opinion, and a majority of the court, however, were of a different mind. Production of Evidence for the Defence. The presence of a majority of all members shall be necessary to constitute a quorum. The origins, composition, and jurisdiction of the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals differed in several important respects beyond their geographical differences and personalities. A diary, letter or other document, including sworn or unsworn statements which appear to the Tribunal to contain information relating to the charge.
In Tokyo as at Nuremberg, the manpower and financial resources committed by the Americans made a huge impact on the collection and processing of documentary evidence collected from German and Japanese archives, offices, and private individuals. The Nuremberg Trial lasted from November to October At the subsequent Moscow Conference, held in Decemberthe Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States with concurrence from China agreed to a basic structure for the occupation of Japan.
The function of Counsel for a Defendant may be discharged at the Defendant’s request intfe any Counsel professionally qualified to conduct cases before the Courts of his own country, or by any other person who may be specially authorized thereto by iimtfe Tribunal.
Thus the conceptual framework was quite similar. The Nuremberg and Tokyo Charters chaarter applicable only to major criminals, leaving other criminals to be tried by the Allies.
Metadata of the document in the Legal Tools Database:
Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers. Provide for the maintenance of order at the trial and deal summarily with any contumacy, imposing appropriate punishment, including exclusion of any accused or his counsel from some or all further proceedings, but without prejudice to the determination of the charges.
Other delegations took even longer to arrive several of the judges did not arrive until the trial had already begun. Cahrter were still free when questioned.
Avalon Home Document Collections Ancient bce – Medieval – 15 th Century – 16 th Century – 17 th Century – 18 th Century – 19 th Chartdr – 20 th Century – 21 st Century. If an accused is not represented by counsel and in open court requests the appointment of counsel, the Tribunal shall designate counsel for him. A report which appears to the Tribunal to have been signed chartet issued by the International Red Cross or a member thereof, or by a doctor of medicine or any medical service personnel, or by an investigator or intelligence officer, or by any other person who appears imtde the Tribunal to have personal knowledge of the matters contained in the report.
The Allied powers also refused to permit the defense counsel any access to its own official documents other than published records. The judgment of the Tribunal as to the guilt or the innocence of any Defendant shall give the reasons on which it is based, and shall be final and not subject to review.
On a number of occasions the thrust of questions put to witnesses came perilously close to implicating Emperor Hirohito personally, but the trial also provided powerful support for the viewpoint that he was chagter benign constitutional monarch who wanted a durable peace and prosperity for his people.
IT services Knowledge resources Library Services to the public. The United States held twelve such trials from toeach of which combined defendants who were accused of similar acts or had participated in related events. Three chartter were found not guilty, one committed suicide prior to trial, and one did not stand trial due to physical or mental illness. Defense motions to dismiss the chaarter against the accused were denied, following which the defense presentation of its case began on February 3,and continued until January 12, A Bibliography of War Crimes Trials.